N S Sajith
AS the day
and night sit-in gains massive support, the Left Democratic
Front has decided
to intensify the struggle demanding the resignation of chief
minister Oommen
Chandy and setting up of
an
impartial judicial probe into the multi-crore solar scam.
LDF convener Vaikom
Vishwan announced that day and night sit-in at secretariat
and district
collectorates will culminate on August 4 and
indefinite secretariat picketing will begin on August
12. The mode of
struggle will be novel and unseen in the history of Kerala,
he said in a press
conference at AKG centre, in Thiruvananthapuram on July 31.
The LDF
volunteers will reach at the premises of secretariat on
August 12th morning
in large numbers. Volunteers
from various parts of the state will add to the people
already gathered. The
functioning of secretariat will be stalled. As part of the
preparations,
district level campaign jathas will be organise from August 4. There
will be no jathas on August
8th and 9th due
to Eid-ul-Fitr.
LDF district committees will meet soon to finalise the
preparations for the jathas.
The LDF will
form a massive organising committee in Thiruvananthapuram
district to manage
the indefinite picketing. The ongoing day and night struggle
in the district
centers and capital is gaining huge support of people from
all walks of life.
The new struggle will also receive such support from the
people, Vaikom Vishwan
said.
CPI(M) Kerala
state secretary, Pinarayi Vijayan alleged that the written
complaint by an accused
in the Solar Panel Scam, which was handed over to additional
chief judicial
magistrate, Ernakulam by the superintendent of the women's
jail on July 31 has
been manipulated. Addressing the media at
Thiruvananthapuram, Pinarayi alleged
that this was done with the knowledge of chief minister
Oommen Chandy. This has
underscored the necessity for a judicial enquiry, he added.
The magistrate
before whom Saritha Nair was produced earlier on July 20 was
unwilling to
record her statement. Vijayan urged higher judicial bodies
to take cognizance
of this matter. Only a day earlier, the chief minister had
predicted that good
news would come. This prediction was a clear hint about the
manipulation of the
statement.
Earlier,
Saritha had sought an opportunity to record her secret
confession before the
magistrate under the section of 164 CrPC. However, when she
appeared before the
magistrate he did not record her confession. The court later
asked her to give
a written complaint. After this incident, police took
Saritha from the prison
at Pathanamthitta where she was lodged, to
Thiruvananthapuram. During transit
the police had managed to influence her. Both appeasement
and threats were
used. Saritha’s mother had also visited her in jail.
Saritha’s
counsel’s statement on the names contained in her statement
becomes more
significant in this context. Her counsel, Feni Balakrishnan,
also warned that
it would be a big shock if the names are made public. No
Congress party leader
has come forward opposing this statement.