Interview with Surjya Kanta Mishra, CPI(M) Polit Bureau member and Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly.
Surjya Kanta Mishra: “The Attack on Democracy is Even More Intense in the Rural Areas.”
“It is as though
criminals have started thinking that it is their Government.” Surjya
Kanta Mishra, Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly and
Polit Bureau member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), feels
that West Bengal is heading towards becoming an “anarchic State”.
In an interview to
Frontline, Mishra spoke about issues ranging from the rise in violence
in the State, the Mamata Banerjee Government's policies and its claims
of achievements made in the past one year. “Instead of taking the State
forward from where it stood a year ago, they are reversing the process
of progress and development, undoing all that had been achieved. The
future really looks gloomy,” he said. Excerpts:
The
CPI(M) has adopted a policy of wait and watch before making any proper
assessment of the Trinamool Government. But what is your preliminary
assessment a year after it came to power? In which direction do you
think the State is heading?
We had never said that we
would not be critical. We said we would play the role of a responsible
Opposition. We will not oppose for the sake of opposing as they [the
Trinamool] did. There is a fundamental difference between our opposition
and theirs. When Mamata Banerjee was announcing her achievements after
100 days or after 200 days [since assuming power], we pointed out that
one could not make a proper assessment in such a short time. The problem
is that she started claiming that she had completed 90 per cent of the
work. We did not want any report card from her, nor did we want to grade
her.
But one thing that has
become clear after almost a year is that the Government does not have
any vision. It is directionless. They have neither any concrete
programme, nor any sense of priority. They are trying to rush things
through, which is proving counterproductive, be it in the area of
industry, land, or problems in the Darjeeling hills. Every time they try
to resolve an issue, they complicate matters further.
But one thing that the
Chief Minister should not have done – a promise she has not kept – is
the assault on democratic institutions and democracy in general. This is
dangerous, and we had earlier warned that this assault would not be
confined to us, the CPI(M). It will spread.
As to where the State is
headed, nobody really knows. All that was done before is now being
undone – like land reforms, the establishment of a democratic,
decentralised panchayat system and other institutions of participatory
democracy. Our successes in the agrarian sector, based on which we were
setting up industries – all such processes are being reversed. This is
endangering the overall growth of the State. I will not yet say that an
anarchic situation is prevalent here, but I fear it is heading in that
direction.
Over
the last several months political violence and crime have been on the
increase. Do you think the Government is doing enough to curb them?
The violence against us
has increased a lot. Since May 2011 [when the Trinamool-led Government
came to power], around 4,800 Left workers and supporters have had to be
hospitalised – most of them in serious condition. A large number of them
have, in fact, been crippled by acts of violence. After coming to
power, the Trinamool forcefully occupied more than 700 CPI(M) offices.
The situation is
particularly bad for Left workers and supporters in the eight districts
of West Medinipur, Bardhaman, Bankura, Hooghly, East Medinipur, Cooch
Behar and the North and South 24 Parganas. In the first four districts
that I mentioned, it is no longer possible to carry out even simple
democratic functions; more than 40,000 Left workers have been driven out
of their homes, party offices have been forcefully occupied, hefty
fines have been imposed upon them. We have a detailed list of these
figures.
It is not possible to
understand the situation by the number of killings alone. In the 1970s,
under the Congress Government, there were more killings of Left workers.
But the situation of silent terror that is prevalent today is more
effective in demoblilising any political opposition. It is not that they
are perpetrating such terror in places where the Left is weak; in fact,
it is worst where we have a reasonably strong support base – like the
first four districts that I just mentioned. You can see how we were
proved right when we said that this violence would be directed not only
against us; today, Congress workers are being attacked. Even sections
within the Trinamool camp are fighting each other.
Apart from political
violence, general crime has also increased greatly. It is as though
criminals have started thinking that it is their Government; and the
police and the administration are just not handling the situation in a
proper manner.
With all these things
happening around us, the Chief Minister remains in denial mode,
insisting that nothing has really happened. In none of the incidents of
violence and crime – be it the Park Street rape case, the murder of two
CPI(M) leaders in broad daylight in Bardhaman, or the rape on a train in
Katwa – has the Chief Minister condemned the acts or apologised for
them. Instead, she said they were orchestrated incidents.
What is your opinion on the Government's policy relating to land acquisition for industries?
First, I would like to
say, regarding land, that thousands of people in rural Bengal have been
ousted in the last one year. Even Trinamool supporters have not been
spared.
Now, regarding the State
Government's land acquisition policy. The Government claims that it is
against acquiring land on behalf of industries. So how can land be
acquired for industrial purposes? Their solution has been to lift the
land ceiling, so investors can directly buy land – but the Government
will have no role in acquiring land from the farmers. Unfortunately,
this will empower the land mafia and the land sharks, and as a result,
farmers will be denied their rightful compensation and rehabilitation
packages, which will not happen if the Government acquires the land.
Moreover, big
manufacturing industries will be reluctant to come, as they know how
difficult it will be for them, without the intervention of the
Government, to get the kind of land required to set up large plants. The
situation is not conducive to big industries.
Not just in the case of
land. The present Government does not really have a proper industrial
policy. Take the case of power. When we were in Government, we left
behind for the State a surplus; the present Government is now in such a
state that it has to reduce power generation to minimise losses.
Moreover, the way the resource mobilisation plan has been done, nobody
knows where funds for infrastructure development will come from. The
process of industrialisation is not just about giving land. It is
important that the atmosphere is also conducive to industrial growth.
What is the Government's major achievement in its first year in power?
Apparently, the
Darjeeling hills are peaceful – which everyone can see is not the case –
and peace has returned to Jangalmahal. But this is just an illusion of
peace. It cannot be considered an achievement, as it is paving the way
for another wave of problems. Then, of course, there are a whole lot of
promises that are yet to be kept. The only positive work that I feel the
Government has done is to have decided not to set up the Legislative
Council as it had decided earlier. We opposed this decision, and they
finally dropped the idea.
Instead of taking the
State forward from where it stood a year ago, we are seeing that they
are reversing the process of progress and development, undoing all that
had been achieved. The future really does look gloomy.
There
has been some disenchantment with the Government among the urban middle
class. Do you think this has spread to rural voters? Will it have an
impact on the upcoming panchayat elections?
We have seen
disillusionment among the urban middle class, even among those who voted
for a change. But the attack on democracy that we talked about is even
more intense in the rural areas. On top of all that, there is major
distress in the agrarian sector, as is evident in the spate of suicides
by farmers and agricultural workers groaning under the burden of debt.
Whether this will
influence the results of the upcoming panchayat elections is very
difficult to say. The ruling party has been threatening to prevent the
Opposition from fielding candidates. It all depends on whether our
candidates will be allowed to file their nominations. But I will say
that when people start understanding the implications of what is
happening around them, they will get disillusioned. But to go into the
mode of active resistance takes some time.
[The interview was published in www.frontlineonnet.com on volume 29 - issue 09 - May 18, 2012]